4.6 Article

The role of nitric oxide in the mechanical repression of RANKL in bone stromal cells

Journal

BONE
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 48-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.03.006

Keywords

nNOS; eNOS; mechanical strain; RANKL; bone remodeling

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR42360, R01 AR042360, R01 AR052014, R56 AR042360, R01 AR042360-11, AR52014, R01 AR052014-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Both mechanical loading and nitric oxide (NO) have positive influences on bone mass. NO production is induced by mechanical strain via upregulation of eNOS mRNA and protein, the predominant NOS in adult bone. At the same time, strain causes decreased expression of RANKL, a factor critical for osteoclastogenesis. In this study, we harvested primary stromal cells from wild-type (WT) and eNOS((-/-)) mice to test whether induction of NO by mechanical strain was necessary for transducing mechanical inhibition of RANKL. We found that strain inhibition of RANKL expression was prevented by NOS inhibitors (L-NAME and L-NMMA) in WT stromal cells. Surprisingly, stromal cells from eNOS((-/-)) mice showed significant mechanical repression of RANKL expression (p<0.05). Mechanical strain still increased NO production in the absence of eNOS, and was abolished by SMTC, a specific nNOS inhibitor. nNOS mRNA and protein expression were increased by strain in eNOS((-/-)) but not in WT cells, revealing that nNOS was mechanically sensitive. When NO synthesis was blocked with either SMTC or siRNA targeting nNOS in eNOS((-/-)) cells however, strain still was able to suppress RANKL expression by 34%. This indicated that strain suppression of RANKL can also occur through non-NO dependent pathways. While our results confirm the importance of NO in the mechanical control of skeletal remodeling, they also suggest alternative signaling pathways by which mechanical force can produce anti-catabolic effects on the skeleton. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available