4.8 Article

Realization of In-Source Collision-Induced Dissociation in Single-Photon Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry and Its Application for Differentiation of Isobaric Compounds

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages 2427-2433

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac5043768

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21207129, 21275143, 21375129]
  2. National Special Fund for the Major Research Equipment and Instrument [2011YQ05006903, 2011YQ05006904]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single-photon ionization mass spectrometry (SPI-MS) is a versatile and powerful analytical technique for online and real-time analysis of organic species; however, it is confronted with an intrinsic drawback of lacking structural information on the investigated molecules, let alone differentiation of isobaric compounds. In this work, we describe a first attempt to integrate in-source collision-induced dissociation (CID) to the SPI ion source in a SPI-MS instrument. The in-source CID was accomplished by elevating the pressure in the ion source to medium vacuum pressure (MVP) and raising the extraction voltage. With the aid of in-source CID, both the SPI-induced molecular ion and CID-generated fragment ion mass spectra can be obtained to endue each analyte with its unique spectrometric fingerprint. The capability for differentiation of isobaric compounds is demonstrated by analyzing two groups of isobaric compounds with molecular weights of 72 and 106 Da, respectively, and quantitative analysis of p-xylene and ethylbenzene in gas mixture. As a result, isobaric compounds with different characteristic fragment ions or appearance energies can be successfully distinguished. The work presents a feasible method for practical applications of SPI-MS to differentiate isobaric compounds conveniently and rapidly without MS/MS technique or coupling additional separation technologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available