Journal
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 327-342Publisher
AMER SOC AGRICULTURAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.13031/2013.39805
Keywords
Agriculture; Farm buildings; Farm machinery; Farm safety; Intervention
Categories
Funding
- Finnish Farmers Social Insurance Institution (Mela), Agrifood Research Finland
- NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH [U54OH010162] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Systematic reviews of agricultural safety and health interventions have shown little evidence of effectiveness. In this study, we used a self-documentation and collaborative interpretation method (cultural probes, n = 9) as well as farm interviews (n = 11) to identify factors affecting the adoption and implementation of safety information. The three main barrier groups found were (1) personal characteristics of the farmer, (2) limited resources to make safety improvements, and (3) the slow incremental evolution of the physical farm environment where old, hazardous environments remain along with new, safer improvements. The enabling factors included good examples or alarming (and thus activating) examples from peers, ease of implementation of the promoted safety measures, and enforcement of regulations. The findings suggest that a user-centered approach could facilitate the development of more effective safety and health interventions. A conceptual model of the safety intervention context created in this study can be used as a framework to examine specific barriers and enabling factors in planning and implementing safety and health interventions.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available