4.7 Article

Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 26, Pages 2863-+

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2267

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA186781, U10 CA180888, P50 CA142509, U10 CA032102] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The clinical outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) is heterogeneous. A simple and reliable tool is needed to stratify patients with MM. We combined the International Staging System (ISS) with chromosomal abnormalities (CA) detected by interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization after CD138 plasma cell purification and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to evaluate their prognostic value in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). Patients and Methods Clinical and laboratory data from 4,445 patients with NDMM enrolled onto 11 international trials were pooled together. The K-adaptive partitioning algorithm was used to define the most appropriate subgroups with homogeneous survival. Results ISS, CA, and LDH data were simultaneously available in 3,060 of 4,445 patients. We defined the following three groups: revised ISS (R-ISS) I (n = 871), including ISS stage I (serum beta(2)-microglobulin level < 3.5 mg/L and serum albumin level >= 3.5 g/dL), no high-risk CA [del(17p) and/or t(4; 14) and/or t(14; 16)], and normal LDH level (less than the upper limit of normal range); R-ISS III (n = 295), including ISS stage III (serum beta(2)-microglobulin level > 5.5 mg/L) and high-risk CA or high LDH level; and R-ISS II (n = 1,894), including all the other possible combinations. At a median follow-up of 46 months, the 5-year OS rate was 82% in the R-ISS I, 62% in the R-ISS II, and 40% in the R-ISS III groups; the 5-year PFS rates were 55%, 36%, and 24%, respectively. Conclusion The R-ISS is a simple and powerful prognostic staging system, and we recommend its use in future clinical studies to stratify patients with NDMM effectively with respect to the relative risk to their survival. (C) 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available