4.7 Article

The Subaru Ly alpha blob survey: a sample of 100-kpc Ly alpha blobs at z=3

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 410, Issue 1, Pages L13-L17

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00969.x

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; cosmology: observations; early Universe

Funding

  1. STFC
  2. Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, and Sports in Japan [20540224]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present results of a survey for giant Ly alpha blobs (LABs) at z = 3 with Subaru/Suprime-Cam. We obtained Ly alpha imaging at z = 3.09 +/- 0.03 around the SSA22 protocluster and in several blank fields. The total survey area is 2.1 deg(2), corresponding to a comoving volume of 1.6 x 10(6) Mpc(3). Using a uniform detection threshold of 1.4 x 10(-18) erg s(-1) cm(-2) arcsec(-2) for the Ly alpha images, we construct a sample of 14 LAB candidates with major-axis diameters larger than 100 kpc, including five previously known blobs and two known quasars. This survey triples the number of known LABs over 100 kpc. The giant LAB sample shows a possible 'morphology-density relation': filamentary LABs reside in average density environments as derived from compact Ly alpha emitters, while circular LABs reside in both average density and overdense environments. Although it is hard to examine the formation mechanisms of LABs only from the Ly alpha morphologies, more filamentary LABs may relate to cold gas accretion from the surrounding intergalactic medium (IGM) and more circular LABs may relate to large-scale gas outflows, which are driven by intense starbursts and/or by active galactic nucleus activities. Our survey highlights the potential usefulness of giant LABs to investigate the interactions between galaxies and the surrounding IGM from the field to overdense environments at high redshift.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available