4.7 Article

Methotrexate, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin (MAP) Plus Maintenance Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b Versus MAP Alone in Patients With Resectable High-Grade Osteosarcoma and Good Histologic Response to Preoperative MAP: First Results of the EURAMOS-1 Good Response Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 20, Pages 2279-U92

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.0734

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute
  2. European Science Foundation under the EUROCORES Program European Clinical Trials from the European Commission [ERASCT-2003-980409]
  3. DG Research, FP6 [MM/NG/EMRC/0202]
  4. St Anna Kinderkrebsforschung (Austria)
  5. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (Belgium)
  6. Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen (Belgium)
  7. Parents Organisation (Czech Republic)
  8. Danish Medical Research Council (Denmark)
  9. Academy of Finland (Finland)
  10. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [BI 1045/1-1, 1-2]
  11. Deutsche Krebshilfe [50-2723-Bi2]
  12. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany) [BMBF 01KN1105]
  13. Semmelweis Foundation (Hungary)
  14. Council for Medical Research (the Netherlands)
  15. Research Council of Norway (Norway)
  16. Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (Sweden)
  17. Swiss Paediatric Oncology Group (Switzerland)
  18. Cancer Research UK (United Kingdom) [CRUK/05/013]
  19. Medical Research Council (United Kingdom)
  20. National Institute for Health Research at University College London Hospitals, and Biomedical Research Centre (United Kingdom)
  21. Medical Research Council [MC_EX_UU_G0400248, MC_UU_12023/11, MC_UU_12023/28, MC_EX_G0400248] Funding Source: researchfish
  22. MRC [MC_EX_UU_G0400248, MC_UU_12023/28, MC_UU_12023/11, MC_EX_G0400248] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose EURAMOS-1, an international randomized controlled trial, investigated maintenance therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b (IFN-alpha-2b) in patients whose osteosarcoma showed good histologic response (good response) to induction chemotherapy. Patients and Methods At diagnosis, patients age <= 40 years with resectable high-grade osteosarcoma were registered. Eligibility after surgery for good response random assignment included >= two cycles of preoperative MAP (methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin), macroscopically complete surgery of primary tumor, < 10% viable tumor, and no disease progression. These patients were randomly assigned to four additional cycles MAP with or without IFN-alpha-2b (0.5 to 1.0 mu g/kg per week subcutaneously, after chemotherapy until 2 years postregistration). Outcome measures were event-free survival (EFS; primary) and overall survival and toxicity (secondary). Results Good response was reported in 1,041 of 2,260 registered patients; 716 consented to random assignment (MAP, n = 359; MAP plus IFN-alpha-2b, n = 357), with baseline characteristics balanced by arm. A total of 271 of 357 started IFN-alpha-2b; 105 stopped early, and 38 continued to receive treatment at data freeze. Refusal and toxicity were the main reasons for never starting IFN-alpha-2b and for stopping prematurely, respectively. Median IFN-alpha-2b duration, if started, was 67 weeks. A total of 133 of 268 patients who started IFN-alpha-2b and provided toxicity information reported grade >= 3 toxicity during IFN-alpha-2b treatment. With median follow-up of 44 months, 3-year EFS for all 716 randomly assigned patients was 76% (95% CI, 72% to 79%); 174 EFS events were reported (MAP, n = 93; MAP plus IFN-alpha-2b, n = 81). Hazard ratio was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.12; P = .214) from an adjusted Cox model. Conclusion At the preplanned analysis time, MAP plus IFN-alpha-2b was not statistically different from MAP alone. A considerable proportion of patients never started IFN-alpha-2b or stopped prematurely. Long-term follow-up for events and survival continues. (C) 2015 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available