4.7 Article

Attribution of observed changes in stratospheric ozone and temperature

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 599-609

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-599-2011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of the Environment of Japan [A-071, B-093]
  2. Office of Science and Technology
  3. NOAA [NA08OAR4310729]
  4. US department of Energy's Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  5. US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Climate Program Office
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [ncas10009, NE/E006787/1, NE/E017150/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. NERC [NE/E006787/1, NE/E017150/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three recently-completed sets of simulations of multiple chemistry-climate models with greenhouse gases only, with all anthropogenic forcings, and with anthropogenic and natural forcings, allow the causes of observed stratospheric changes to be quantitatively assessed using detection and attribution techniques. The total column ozone response to halogenated ozone depleting substances and to natural forcings is detectable in observations, but the total column ozone response to greenhouse gas changes is not separately detectable. In the middle and upper stratosphere, simulated and observed SBUV/SAGE ozone changes are broadly consistent, and separate anthropogenic and natural responses are detectable in observations. The influence of ozone depleting substances and natural forcings can also be detected separately in observed lower stratospheric temperature, and the magnitudes of the simulated and observed responses to these forcings and to greenhouse gas changes are found to be consistent. In the mid and upper stratosphere the simulated natural and combined anthropogenic responses are detectable and consistent with observations, but the influences of greenhouse gases and ozone-depleting substances could not be separately detected in our analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available