4.7 Article

VOC reactivity and its effect on ozone production during the HaChi summer campaign

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 4657-4667

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-4657-2011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. 973 Program [2011CB403402]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [40875001]
  3. Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences [2008Z011]
  4. Ministry of Environmental Protection of China [200909022]
  5. Tianjin Fundamental Research Program [10JCYBJC05800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurements of ozone and its precursors conducted within the HaChi (Haze in China) project in summer 2009 were analyzed to characterize volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and their effects on ozone photochemical production at a suburban site in the North China Plain (NCP). Ozone episodes, during which running 8-h average ozone concentrations exceeding 80 ppbv lasted for more than 4 h, occurred on about two thirds of the observational days during the 5-week field campaign. This suggests continuous ozone exposure risks in this region in the summer. Average concentrations of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and VOCs are about 20 ppbv and 650 ppbC, respectively. On average, total VOC reactivity is dominated by anthropogenic VOCs. The contribution of biogenic VOCs to total ozone-forming potential, however, is also considerable in the daytime. Key species associated with ozone photochemical production are 2-butenes (18 %), isoprene (15 %), trimethylbenzenes (11 %), xylenes (8.5 %), 3-methylhexane (6 %), n-hexane (5 %) and toluene (4.5%). Formation of ozone is found to be NOx-limited as indicated by measured VOCs/NOx ratios and further confirmed by a sensitivity study using a photochemical box model NCAR_MM. The Model simulation suggests that ozone production is also sensitive to changes in VOC reactivity under the NOx-limited regime, although this sensitivity depends strongly on how much NOx is present.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available