4.6 Review

Interventions for preventing obesity in children

Journal

COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
Volume -, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001871.pub3

Keywords

Adolescent; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diet; Exercise; Obesity [diet therapy; prevention & control]; Treatment Outcome; Child; Humans

Funding

  1. School of Health and Social Care, University of Teesside, UK
  2. School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
  3. Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University, Australia
  4. Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program, Australia
  5. Department of Health, UK
  6. World Health Organisation, Switzerland
  7. Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth), Victoria, Australia
  8. Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, Australia
  9. National Health and Medical Research Council Capacity Building Grant, Australia
  10. The Jack Brockhoff Foundation, Australia
  11. Karen Campbell is supported by a VicHealth Fellowship, Australia
  12. NHMRC for Child and Adolescent Obesity Prevention, Australia
  13. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007470/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. ESRC [ES/G007470/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Prevention of childhood obesity is an international public health priority given the significant impact of obesity on acute and chronic diseases, general health, development and well-being. The international evidence base for strategies that governments, communities and families can implement to prevent obesity, and promote health, has been accumulating but remains unclear. Objectives This review primarily aims to update the previous Cochrane review of childhood obesity prevention research and determine the effectiveness of evaluated interventions intended to prevent obesity in children, assessed by change in Body Mass Index (BMI). Secondary aims were to examine the characteristics of the programs and strategies to answer the questions What works for whom, why and for what cost? Search methods The searches were re-run in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and CINAHL in March 2010 and searched relevant websites. Non-English language papers were included and experts were contacted. Selection criteria The review includes data from childhood obesity prevention studies that used a controlled study design (with or without randomisation). Studies were included if they evaluated interventions, policies or programs in place for twelve weeks or more. If studies were randomised at a cluster level, 6 clusters were required. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Data was extracted on intervention implementation, cost, equity and outcomes. Outcome measures were grouped according to whether they measured adiposity, physical activity (PA)-related behaviours or diet-related behaviours. Adverse outcomes were recorded. A meta-analysis was conducted using available BMI or standardised BMI (zBMI) score data with subgroup analysis by age group (0-5, 6-12, 13-18 years, corresponding to stages of developmental and childhood settings). Main results This review includes 55 studies (an additional 36 studies found for this update). The majority of studies targeted children aged 612 years. The meta-analysis included 37 studies of 27,946 children and demonstrated that programmes were effective at reducing adiposity, although not all individual interventions were effective, and there was a high level of observed heterogeneity (I-2=82%). Overall, children in the intervention group had a standardised mean difference in adiposity (measured as BMI or zBMI) of -0.15kg/m(2) (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.21 to -0.09). Intervention effects by age subgroups were -0.26kg/m(2) (95% CI:-0.53 to 0.00) (05 years), -0.15kg/m(2) (95% CI -0.23 to -0.08) (6-12 years), and -0.09kg/m(2) (95% CI -0.20 to 0.03) (13-18 years). Heterogeneity was apparent in all three age groups and could not explained by randomisation status or the type, duration or setting of the intervention. Only eight studies reported on adverse effects and no evidence of adverse outcomes such as unhealthy dieting practices, increased prevalence of underweight or body image sensitivities was found. Interventions did not appear to increase health inequalities although this was examined in fewer studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available