4.7 Article

High levels of circulating leukocyte microparticles are associated with better outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Journal

CRITICAL CARE
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/cc9978

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Association pour le Developpement des Recherches Biologiques et Medicales au CHU de Marseille (ADEREM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The current study has addressed the presence and the cellular origin of microparticles (MP) isolated from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and from blood samples from patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Their prognostic interest was also investigated. Methods: Fifty-two patients were included within the first 24 hours of ARDS. They were compared to spontaneous breathing (SB) and ventilated control (VC) groups. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and blood samples were obtained on Day 1 and Day 3 in an ARDS group. Leukocyte microparticles (LeuMP), neutrophil microparticles (NeuMP), endothelial microparticles (EMP), and platelet microparticles (PMP) were measured in arterial blood and in BAL samples by flow cytometry. Mortality from all causes was recorded at Day 28. Results: All MP subpopulations were detected in BAL. However, only LeuMP and NeuMP were elevated in ARDS patients compared to the SB group (P = 0.002 for both). Among ARDS patients, higher levels of LeuMP were detected in blood (Day 1) and in BAL (Day 3) in survivors as compared with the non survivors. Circulating LeuMP > 60 elements/microliter detectable on Day 1 of ARDS, was associated with a higher survival rate (odds ratio, 5.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 24.99; P = 0.037). Conclusions: The identification of the cellular origin of microparticles at the onset of ARDS has identified LeuMP as a biomarker of prognostic significance. The higher levels of LeuMP in survivors could be associated with a protective role of this MP subpopulation. This hypothesis needs further investigations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available