4.6 Article

Prevention of type 2 diabetes in a primary healthcare setting: Three-year results of lifestyle intervention in Japanese subjects with impaired glucose tolerance

Journal

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-40

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Labour of Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A randomized control trial was performed to test whether a lifestyle intervention program, carried out in a primary healthcare setting using existing resources, can reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes in Japanese with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). The results of 3 years' intervention are summarized. Methods: Through health checkups in communities and workplaces, 304 middle-aged IGT subjects with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 24.5 kg/m(2) were recruited and randomized to the intervention group or control group. The lifestyle intervention was carried out for 3 years by public health nurses using the curriculum and educational materials provided by the study group. Results: After 1 year, the intervention had significantly improved body weight (-1.5 +/- 0.7 vs. -0.7 +/- 2.5 kg in the control; p = 0.023) and daily non-exercise leisure time energy expenditure (25 +/- 113 vs. -3 +/- 98 kcal; p = 0.045). Insulin sensitivity assessed by the Matsuda index was improved by the intervention during the 3 years. The 3-year cumulative incidence tended to be lower in the intervention group (14.8% vs. 8.2%, log-rank test: p = 0.097). In a sub-analysis for the subjects with a BMI > 22.5 kg/m(2), a significant reduction in the cumulative incidence was found (p = 0.027). Conclusions: The present lifestyle intervention program using existing healthcare resources is beneficial in preventing diabetes in Japanese with IGT. This has important implications for primary healthcare-based diabetes prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available