4.6 Review

Review of the BCI competition IV

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00055

Keywords

brain-computer interface; BCI; competition

Categories

Funding

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [Fkz 01IB001A, 01GQ0850]
  2. German Science Foundation (DFG) [MU 987/3-2]
  3. European ICT Programme [FP7-224631, 216886]
  4. World Class University Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [R31-10008]
  5. US Army Research Office [W911NF-08-1-0216, W911NF-07-1-0415]
  6. NIH [EB006356, EB000856]
  7. WIN-Kolleg of the Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities
  8. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GQ0420, 01GQ0761, 01GQ0762, 01GQ0830]
  9. German Research Foundation [550/B5, C6]
  10. German National Academic Foundation
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R01EB000856, R01EB006356] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The BCI competition IV stands in the tradition of prior BCI competitions that aim to provide high quality neuroscientific data for open access to the scientific community. As experienced already in prior competitions not only scientists from the narrow field of BCI compete, but scholars with a broad variety of backgrounds and nationalities. They include high specialists as well as students. The goals of all BCI competitions have always been to challenge with respect to novel paradigms and complex data. We report on the following challenges: (1) asynchronous data, (2) synthetic, (3) multi-class continuous data, (4) session-to-session transfer, (5) directionally modulated MEG, (6) finger movements recorded by ECoG. As after past competitions, our hope is that winning entries may enhance the analysis methods of future BCIs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available