4.0 Article

Numerical Simulation of the Heavy Rainfall in the Yangtze-Huai River Basin during Summer 2003 Using the WRF Model

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 20-25

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/16742834.2012.11446958

Keywords

heavy rainfall; Yangtze-Huai River Basin; the Weather Research and Forecast model; low-level jet

Funding

  1. Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-YW-Q11-04]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2010AA012304]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40905049]
  4. LASG State Key Laboratory special fund
  5. LASG free exploration fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a 47-day regional climate simulation of the heavy rainfall in the Yangtze-Huai River Basin during the summer of 2003 was conducted using the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model. The simulation reproduces reasonably well the evolution of the rainfall during the study period's three successive rainy phases, especially the frequent heavy rainfall events occurring in the Huai River Basin. The model captures the major rainfall peak observed by the monitoring stations in the morning. Another peak appears later than that shown by the observations. In addition, the simulation realistically captures not only the evolution of the low-level winds but also the characteristics of their diurnal variation. The strong southwesterly (low-level jet, LLJ) wind speed increases beginning in the early evening and reaches a peak in the morning; it then gradually decreases until the afternoon. The intense LLJ forms a strong convergent circulation pattern in the early morning along the Yangtze-Huai River Basin. This pattern partly explains the rainfall peak observed at this time. This study furnishes a basis for the further analysis of the mechanisms of evolution of the LLJ and for the further study of the interactions between the LLJ and rainfall.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available