4.3 Article

PTSD as Meaning Violation: Testing a Cognitive Worldview Perspective

Journal

Publisher

EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0018792

Keywords

trauma; cognitive perspective; meaning; trauma appraisals; belief violation

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR024156] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R21 MH075737] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [UL1RR024156] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R21MH075737] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cognitive perspective on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been successful in explaining many PTSD-related phenomena and in developing effective treatments, yet some of its basic assumptions remain surprisingly underexamined. The present study tested 2 of these assumptions: (1) situational appraisals of the event as violating global meaning (i.e., beliefs and goals) is related to PTSD symptomatology, and (2) the effect of situational appraisals of violation on PTSD symptomatology is mediated by global meaning (i.e., views of self and world). We tested these assumptions in a cross-sectional study of 130 college students who had experienced a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., American Psychiatric Association, 1994) level trauma. Structural equation modeling showed that appraisals of the extent to which the trauma violated one's beliefs and goals related fairly strongly to PTSD. In addition, the effects of appraisals of belief and goal violations on PTSD symptoms were fully mediated through negative global beliefs about both the self and the world. These findings support the cognitive worldview perspective, highlighting the importance of the meaning individuals assign to traumatic events, particularly the role of meaning violation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available