3.8 Review

Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review

Journal

LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES
Volume 27, Issue 7-8, Pages 953-978

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.705006

Keywords

Speech recognition; Lexical access; Adverse conditions; Signal degradation; Cognitive load; Masking

Funding

  1. ESRC [ES/I000682/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. MRC [MC_U105580446] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/I000682/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_U105580446] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a review of the effects of adverse conditions (ACs) on the perceptual, linguistic, cognitive, and neurophysiological mechanisms underlying speech recognition. The review starts with a classification of ACs based on their origin: Degradation at the source (production of a noncanonical signal), degradation during signal transmission (interfering signal or medium-induced impoverishment of the target signal), receiver limitations (peripheral, linguistic, cognitive). This is followed by a parallel, yet orthogonal classification of ACs based on the locus of their effect: Perceptual processes, mental representations, attention, and memory functions. We then review the added value that ACs provide for theories of speech recognition, with a focus on fundamental themes in psycholinguistics: Content and format of lexical representations, time-course of lexical access, word segmentation, feed-back in speech perception and recognition, lexicalsemantic integration, interface between the speech system and general cognition, neuroanatomical organisation of speech processing. We conclude by advocating an approach to speech recognition that includes rather than neutralises complex listening environments and individual differences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available