Journal
CLIMATE POLICY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages S85-S106Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2012.702982
Keywords
climate change; climate policy options; public perception; risk communication
Categories
Funding
- ESRC [not_applicable, ES/F035888/1, ES/F037511/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Economic and Social Research Council [ES/F035888/1, ES/F037511/1, not_applicable] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Although levels of concern and awareness about climate change have been rising in many nations over the past 20 years, climate change remains of low importance relative to other global or personal issues. Powerful contextual barriers act to prevent public engagement with it, such as psychological distancing and externalized responsibility. Despite extensive media coverage of the issue since 2006 there was a gradual decrease in public concern between 2006 and 2010. Possible explanations are issue fatigue, the impact of the global financial crisis, distrust, and the deepening politicization of the issue. Risk and uncertainty will become part of the debate about climate change policy in the future. Although engaging both the public and decision makers needs to draw upon the best guidance already developed in communicating risk, it is also likely that a radical reframing of the terms of public debate and new approaches to 'risk communication' will be needed. The most significant risk to achieving ambitious climate mitigation and adaptation goals appears to be the 'governance trap' engendered by current national and international systems of governance, such that the public and governments each seek to attribute responsibility for instigating change to the other.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available