4.1 Article

EU agri-innovation policy: two contending visions of the bio-economy

Journal

CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 40-65

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2012.659881

Keywords

imaginaries; agri-innovation policy; cultural political economy; critical discourse analysis; sustainable agriculture; eco-efficiency; life sciences; agroecology; knowledge-based bio-economy (KBBE); European Technology Platforms (ETPs); Framework Programme 7

Funding

  1. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme [217647]
  2. ESRC [ES/F028180/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The knowledge-based bio-economy has gained prominence as a research and innovation policy of the European Union. As a policy framework the knowledge-based bio-economy has attracted two contending visions, which can be analyzed as imaginaries - strategic discourses prefiguring a possible, desirable future. In the dominant vision, life sciences will enhance productivity for European competitive advantage in global value chains. A rival vision links agroecology and shorter food supply chains, as a means for farmers to gain more from the value that they add. Each vision favors a different diagnosis of unsustainable agriculture and eco-efficient remedies. Each extends a different paradigm of agri-innovation, foreseeing an economic community that can gain from future markets. These two contending visions give different meanings to the same key terms - knowledge, biological resources and economy. In the EU's research program for a knowledge-based bio-economy, a life sciences vision dominates the priorities, though agroecology has also gained a significant place in response to proposals from stakeholder networks. Through these efforts, research policy priorities have been opened up to more plural agri-innovation pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available