3.8 Article

Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials (mfVEP) in Diabetic Patients with and without Polyneuropathy

Journal

OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 98-103

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1874364101206010098

Keywords

Diabetic retinopathy; neuropathy; multifocal VEP (mfVEP)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previously not shown this study support that mfVEP is an indicator of optic nerve neuropathy in diabetic patients and there could be a correlation between the optic nerve dysfunction and diabetic poly neuropathy. The early optic nerve involvement might explain some of the visual complain in this group of diabetic patients. Purpose: To investigate the function of the visual pathway measured by mfVEP (multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials) in patients with diabetic retinopathy and neurophysiologically verified polyneuropathy Subjects and Methods: Thirty-two diabetic patients with the same degree of diabetic retinopathy were classified with neurography regarding polyneuropathy and further examined with mfVEP. The mfVEPs of eighteen patients with polyneuropathy were compared to those of fourteen diabetic patients without polyneuropathy and to those of ten nondiabetic subjects. Results: Diabetic duration, and the number of patients who had undergone panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy were similar in the two patient groups, 29 +/- 13 vs 25 +/- 7 years, p=0.3. Both groups of patients with diabetic retinopathy had significantly lower amplitudes in the mfVEP than the healthy subjects. In addition the mfVEP amplitudes, which reflect selected areas of the visual function, were significantly reduced in the lower nasal quadrant in patients with neuropathy compared to patients without neuropathy. Conclusion: The results indicate that mfVEP could be an indicator of optic nerve neuropathy in patients with diabetic retinopathy. The early optic nerve involvement might explain some of the visual complaints in this group of diabetic patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available