4.7 Article

Multi-material, multi-technology stereolithography This feature article covers a decade of research into tackling one of the major challenges of the stereolithography technique, which is including multiple materials in one construct

Journal

VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 181-194

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2012.721119

Keywords

multiple material; additive manufacturing; hybrid manufacturing; direct print; 3D structural electronics; tissue engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For more than a decade, our group has been developing the methods and systems required to have spatial control over material placement and structure creation, leading to, for example, the realisation of complex three-dimensional (3D) devices that integrate electronics and thus intelligence within mechanical structures as well as 3D spatially complex bioactive, implantable, tissue engineered constructs. There are myriad issues associated with combining multiple materials to create functional products, ranging from the deposition and processing of different materials to the combined performance of the materials in the resulting product. Stereolithography (SL) has been the primary technology focus of this work because it offers high quality surface finish, dimensional accuracy, and a variety of material options that includes implantable materials. Moreover, SL builds in essentially ambient, minimally controlled environmental conditions that provide easy access to the build chamber and enable straightforward conversion of existing single material SL systems to multiple material and hybrid manufacturing systems. This paper describes the development of multiple material and multiple technology (hybrid) stereolithography systems capable of manufacturing multiple material structures with mechanical, electrical, and biochemical functionality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available