4.5 Article

Large-scale features of Pliocene climate: results from the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project

Journal

CLIMATE OF THE PAST
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 191-209

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/cp-9-191-2013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC [278636]
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council
  3. Leverhulme Trust
  4. National Centre for Atmospheric Research
  5. British Geological Survey
  6. POLMAR
  7. PACES
  8. NERC [NE/H006273/1]
  9. RCUK
  10. US National Science Foundation (NSF)
  11. NSF
  12. NSF [ATM0323516]
  13. NASA [NNX10AU63A]
  14. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/I016287/1, NE/G009112/1]
  15. NERC [NE/G009112/1, bgs05002, NE/I016287/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  16. Natural Environment Research Council [ncas10009, NE/I016287/1, NE/G009112/1, NE/H006273/1, bgs05002] Funding Source: researchfish
  17. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22101005] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate and environments of the mid-Pliocene warm period (3.264 to 3.025 Ma) have been extensively studied. Whilst numerical models have shed light on the nature of climate at the time, uncertainties in their predictions have not been systematically examined. The Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project quantifies uncertainties in model outputs through a coordinated multi-model and multi-model/data intercomparison. Whilst commonalities in model outputs for the Pliocene are clearly evident, we show substantial variation in the sensitivity of models to the implementation of Pliocene boundary conditions. Models appear able to reproduce many regional changes in temperature reconstructed from geological proxies. However, data/model comparison highlights that models potentially underestimate polar amplification. To assert this conclusion with greater confidence, limitations in the time-averaged proxy data currently available must be addressed. Furthermore, sensitivity tests ex-ploring the known unknowns in modelling Pliocene climate specifically relevant to the high latitudes are essential (e. g. palaeogeography, gateways, orbital forcing and trace gasses). Estimates of longer-term sensitivity to CO2 (also known as Earth System Sensitivity; ESS), support previous work suggesting that ESS is greater than Climate Sensitivity (CS), and suggest that the ratio of ESS to CS is between 1 and 2, with a best estimate of 1.5.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available