4.8 Review

Are behavioral interventions effective in increasing physical activity at 12 to 36 months in adults aged 55 to 70 years? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

BMC MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-75

Keywords

Physical activity; intervention; aging; systematic review; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Lifelong Health and Wellbeing initiative (LLHW)
  2. UK Research Councils and Health Departments
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council
  4. Medical Research Council
  5. Economic and Social Research Council
  6. Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates
  7. National Institute for Health Research/The Department of Health
  8. Centre for Translational Research in Public Health
  9. UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence
  10. British Heart Foundation
  11. Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, and the National Institute for Health Research
  12. UK Clinical Research Collaboration
  13. ESRC [ES/G007470/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. MRC [G0700718] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007470/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. Medical Research Council [G0700718, MR/K02325X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Retirement represents a major transitional life stage in middle to older age. Changes in physical activity typically accompany this transition, which has significant consequences for health and well-being. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence for the effect of interventions to promote physical activity in adults aged 55 to 70 years, focusing on studies that reported long-term effectiveness. This systematic review adheres to a registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42011001459). Methods: Randomized controlled trials of interventions to promote physical activity behavior with a mean/median sample age of 55 to 70 years, published between 2000 and 2010, were identified. Only trials reporting the longterm effect (>= 12 months) on objective or self-reported physical activity behavior were included. Trials reporting physiological proxy measures of physical activity were excluded. Meta-analyses were conducted when trials provided sufficient data and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify potential confounding effects of trials of poor methodological quality or with attrition rates >= 30%. Results: Of 17,859 publications identified, 32 were included which reported on 21 individual trials. The majority of interventions were multimodal and provided physical activity and lifestyle counselling. Interventions to promote physical activity were effective at 12 months (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.16 to 1.99, pedometer step-count, approximating to an increase of 2,197 steps per day; SMD = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.28, self-reported physical activity duration outcome), but not at 24 months based on a small subset of trials. There was no evidence for a relationship between intervention effectiveness and mode of delivery or number of intervention contacts; however, interventions which involved individually tailoring with personalized activity goals or provision of information about local opportunities in the environment may be more effective. Conclusions: Interventions in adults aged 55 to 70 years led to long term improvements in physical activity at 12 months; however, maintenance beyond this is unclear. Identified physical activity improvements are likely to have substantial health benefits in reducing the risk of age-related illnesses. These findings have important implications for community-based public health interventions in and around the retirement transition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available