Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study
Sabrina Winona Pit et al.
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE (2013)
No difference demonstrated between faxed or mailed prenotification in promoting questionnaire response among family physicians: a randomized controlled trial
Melina Gattellari et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2012)
A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors
Anthony Scott et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2011)
Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study
Jeppe B. Schroll et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2011)
Do GPs respond to postal questionnaire surveys? A comprehensive review of primary care literature
Samuel T. Creavin et al.
FAMILY PRACTICE (2011)
Getting Physicians to Respond: The Impact of Incentive Type and Timing on Physician Survey Response Rates
Katherine M. James et al.
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2011)
The Effects of Tracking Responses and the Day of Mailing on Physician Survey Response Rate: Three Randomized Trials
Elie A. Akl et al.
PLOS ONE (2011)
Identifying strategies to maximise recruitment and retention of practices and patients in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of an intervention to optimise secondary prevention for coronary heart disease in primary care
Claire S. Leathem et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2009)
Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective - A postal survey
Anne Spaar et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2009)
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
David Moher et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2009)
Questionnaire order significantly increased response to a postal survey sent to primary care physicians
Frances J. Drummond et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Registered post achieved a higher response rate than normal mail - A randomized controlled trial
Alisa Pedrana et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians - A systematic review
Jonathan B. VanGeest et al.
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS (2007)
Incentives and disincentives to participation by clinicians in randomised controlled trials
J. M. Rendell et al.
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2007)
The influence of advance letters on response in telephone surveys - A meta-analysis
Edith De Leeuw et al.
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY (2007)
Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial
JS Hocking et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates
J Robertson et al.
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY (2005)
In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate
C Jepson et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2005)
Short report: Encouraging GPs to complete postal questionnaires-one big prize or many small prizes? A randomized controlled trial
CE Thomson et al.
FAMILY PRACTICE (2004)
I am not selling anything: 29 experiments in telephone introductions
ED de Leeuw et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH (2004)
Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey
G Baron et al.
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS (2001)
Physician response to surveys - A review of the literature
SE Kellerman et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2001)
Response rates of Victorian general practitioners to a mailed survey on miscarriage: randomised trial of a prize and two forms of introduction to the research
B McLaren et al.
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2000)
Share Paper
