Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.COVARIATE IMBALANCE AND ADJUSTMENT FOR LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL TRIAL DATA
Jody D. Ciolino et al.
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS (2013)
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
An-Wen Chan et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)
Assessment and Implication of Prognostic Imbalance in Randomized Controlled Trials with a Binary Outcome - A Simulation Study
Rong Chu et al.
PLOS ONE (2012)
Reporting and analysis of trials using stratified randomisation in leading medical journals: review and reanalysis
Brennan C. Kahan et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2012)
Quantifying the cost in power of ignoring continuous covariate imbalances in clinical trial randomization
Jody Ciolino et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2011)
A substantial and confusing variation exists in handling of baseline covariates in randomized controlled trials: a review of trials published in leading medical journals
Peter C. Austin et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
Are Unadjusted Analyses of Clinical Trials Inappropriately Biased Toward the Null?
David M. Kent et al.
STROKE (2009)
Handling Covariates in the Design of Clinical Trials
William F. Rosenberger et al.
STATISTICAL SCIENCE (2008)
ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies
Gerard J. P. Van Breukelen
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
Randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: How much does prespecified covariate adjustment increase power?
AV Hernandez et al.
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
Statistical power for analyses of changes in randomized controlled trials
YK Tu et al.
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH (2005)
Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements
AV Hernández et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2004)
Evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up
J Twisk et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2004)
Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials
A Hagino et al.
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS (2004)
Faulty assumptions in Atkinson's criteria for clinical trial design
DR Taves
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2004)
The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials: a review
NW Scott et al.
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS (2002)
Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems
SJ Pocock et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)
Statistics notes - Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements
AJ Vickers et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2001)
Analysis of data with imbalance in the baseline outcome variable for randomized clinical trials
L Wei et al.
DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL (2001)
On stratification, minimization and protection against types 1 and 2 error - Response
WN Kernan et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2001)
How to select covariates to include in the analysis of a clinical trial
GM Raab et al.
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS (2000)
Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction: Should we adjust for baseline characteristics?
EW Steyerberg et al.
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL (2000)
Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials
SF Assmann et al.
LANCET (2000)
Share Paper
