Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Those Who Have the Gold Make the Evidence: How the Pharmaceutical Industry Biases the Outcomes of Clinical Trials of Medications
Joel Lexchin
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2012)
Sponsors' participation in conduct and reporting of industry trials: a descriptive study
Andreas Lundh et al.
TRIALS (2012)
Outcome Reporting Among Drug Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
Florence T. Bourgeois et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2010)
Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes
Isabelle Boutron et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2010)
The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed
Sally Hopewell et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2010)
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Kenneth F. Schulz et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2010)
Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials
Sylvain Mathieu et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2009)
Relation of study quality, concordance, take home message, funding, and impact in studies of influenza vaccines: systematic review
T. Jefferson et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2009)
Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences: A qualitative systematic review
Sergio Sismondo
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2008)
Publication bias in orthopedic research:: An analysis of scientific factors associated with publication in the journal of bone and joint surgery (American volume)
Kanu Okike et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2008)
Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy
Erick H. Turner et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2008)
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
Kerry Dwan et al.
PLOS ONE (2008)
Influence of drug company authorship and sponsorship on drug trial outcomes
Tongeji Tungaraza et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY (2007)
Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; Good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not
Joseph R. Lynch et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2007)
Association between pharmaceutical involvement and outcomes in breast cancer clinical trials
Jeffrey Peppercorn et al.
CANCER (2007)
Reported outcomes in major cardiovascular clinical trials funded by for-profit and not-for-profit organizations: 2000-2005
PM Ridker et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2006)
Association of funding and findings of pharmaceutical research at a meeting of a medical professional society
TE Finucane et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2004)
Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials - A reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?
B Als-Nielsen et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2003)
Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting
MK Krzyzanowska et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2003)
Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review
J Lexchin et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2003)
Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research - A systematic review
JE Bekelman et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2003)
Publication bias in editorial decision making
CM Olson et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002)
Share Paper
