Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.An international registry of systematic-review protocols
Alison Booth et al.
LANCET (2011)
Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
Hilda Bastian et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2010)
A systematic review and quality assessment of systematic reviews of randomised trials of interventions for preventing and treating preterm birth
Valerie Smith et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY (2009)
An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies
Margaret Sampson et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Beverley J. Shea et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2009)
Systematic review of reviews of risk factors for intracranial aneurysms
Mike Clarke
NEURORADIOLOGY (2008)
Prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of preterm birth in women at risk: A meta-analysis
Rachael Simcox et al.
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY (2007)
A systematic review and quality assessment of systematic reviews of fetal fibronectin and transvaginal length for predicting preterm birth
Valerie Smith et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY (2007)
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews
David Moher et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2007)
EMBASE search strategies achieved for retrieving methodologically high sensitivity and specificity sound systematic reviews
Nancy L. Wilczynski et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)
Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey
VM Montori et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2005)
Share Paper
