4.4 Article

Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials

J. Pildal et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials

R. Kunz et al.

COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2007)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review

Anders W. Jorgensen et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2006)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Somatostatin analogues for acute bleeding oesophageal varices

PC Gotzsche et al.

COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2005)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Assessing the quality of research

P Glasziou et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2004)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials -: Comparison of Protocols to published articles

AW Chan et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2004)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses

LL Kjaergard et al.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2001)

Letter Medicine, Research & Experimental

Quality in the reporting of randomized trials in surgery: Is the Jadad scale reliable?

M Bhandari et al.

CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS (2001)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Systematic reviews in health care -: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

P Jüni et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2001)