4.1 Article

Recent methods for polygenic analysis of genome-wide data implicate an important effect of common variants on cardiovascular disease risk

Journal

BMC MEDICAL GENETICS
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-12-146

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [T32 HD007289]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [T32 MH016880, MH063445]
  3. National Institute on Drug Abuse [T32 DA017637]
  4. National Institutes of Health
  5. National Institute of Mental Health (Bethesda, MD, USA) [MH085812]
  6. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study [N01-HC-25195]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Traditional genome-wide association studies are generally limited in their ability explain a large portion of genetic risk for most common diseases. We sought to use both traditional GWAS methods, as well as more recently developed polygenic genome-wide analysis techniques to identify subsets of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that may be involved in risk of cardiovascular disease, as well as estimate the heritability explained by common SNPs. Methods: Using data from the Framingham SNP Health Association Resource (SHARe), three complimentary methods were applied to examine the genetic factors associated with the Framingham Risk Score, a widely accepted indicator of underlying cardiovascular disease risk. The first method adopted a traditional GWAS approach-independently testing each SNP for association with the Framingham Risk Score. The second two approaches involved polygenic methods with the intention of providing estimates of aggregate genetic risk and heritability. Results: While no SNPs were independently associated with the Framingham Risk Score based on the results of the traditional GWAS analysis, we were able to identify cardiovascular disease-related SNPs as reported by previous studies. A predictive polygenic analysis was only able to explain approximately 1% of the genetic variance when predicting the 10-year risk of general cardiovascular disease. However, 20% to 30% of the variation in the Framingham Risk Score was explained using a recently developed method that considers the joint effect of all SNPs simultaneously. Conclusion: The results of this study imply that common SNPs explain a large amount of the variation in the Framingham Risk Score and suggest that future, better-powered genome-wide association studies, possibly informed by knowledge of gene-pathways, will uncover more risk variants that will help to elucidate the genetic architecture of cardiovascular disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available