4.1 Article

Genome screen in familial intracranial aneurysm

Journal

BMC MEDICAL GENETICS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-10-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke [ROI NS39512]
  2. National Institutes of Health [NOI-HG-65403]
  3. NHGRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Individuals with 1st degree relatives harboring an intracranial aneurysm (IA) are at an increased risk of IA, suggesting genetic variation is an important risk factor. Methods: Families with multiple members having ruptured or unruptured A were recruited and all available medical records and imaging data were reviewed to classify possible A subjects as definite, probable or possible A or not a case. A 6 K SNP genome screen was performed in 333 families, representing the largest linkage study of A reported to date. A 'narrow' (n = 705 definite A cases) and 'broad' (n = 866 definite or probable IA) disease definition were used in multipoint model-free linkage analysis and parametric linkage analysis, maximizing disease parameters. Ordered subset analysis (OSA) was used to detect gene x smoking interaction. Results: Model-free linkage analyses detected modest evidence of possible linkage (all LOD < 1.5). Parametric analyses yielded an unadjusted LOD score of 2.6 on chromosome 4q (162 cM) and 3.1 on chromosome 12p (50 cM). Significant evidence for a gene x smoking interaction was detected using both disease models on chromosome 7p (60 cM; p <= 0.01). Our study provides modest evidence of possible linkage to several chromosomes. Conclusion: These data suggest it is unlikely that there is a single common variant with a strong effect in the majority of the A families. Rather, it is likely that multiple genetic and environmental risk factors contribute to the susceptibility for intracranial aneurysms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available