4.6 Review

Living with chronic illness in adults: a concept analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
Volume 24, Issue 17-18, Pages 2357-2367

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12827

Keywords

adults; concept analysis; Living with chronic illness; nursing; Rodgers

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims and objectivesTo report an analysis of the concept of Living with chronic illness in adults, using Rodger's evolutionary analytical methodology. BackgroundIn the literature, several qualitative studies exist that address the question of Living with chronic illness from the adult patient's perspective. However, the lack of clarity and consensus among the existing studies renders this concept ambiguous when it is analysed in depth. DesignA narrative review. MethodsA systematic search has been carried out on electronic databases such as Medline (PubMed), Cinahl (Ebsco), Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (Ovid), Embase, Cuiden, Dialnet and Scielo. This was limited to articles published in either Spanish or English, from 2003-2013. ResultsLiving with chronic illness is a complex, dynamic, cyclic and multidimensional process, and involves the development of five different attributes: Acceptance, Coping, Self-management, Integration and Adjustment. Depending on how these attributes operate, there are four different ways of living which can result from the process of Living with chronic illness: (1) Disavowal, (2) False Normality, (3) The New Normal and (4) Disruption. ConclusionsThis paper contributes to the understanding of the concept Living with chronic illness'. Findings in this analysis have to be evaluated with caution and further research is needed on this topic to confirm them. Also, more studies in evaluating how patients live a long-term condition are recommended to foster patient-centred care. Relevance to clinical practiceFindings generated from this concept analysis can raise awareness of Living with chronic illness so that this process could be assessed in a correct and uniform way in the clinical community and improved when needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available