Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Personal privacy, public benefits, and biobanks: a conjoint analysis of policy priorities and public perceptions
Daryl Pullman et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2012)
Patient involvement in a scientific advisory process: Setting the research agenda for medical products
Janneke Elisabeth Elberse et al.
HEALTH POLICY (2012)
Patient empowerment—who empowers whom?
The Lancet
LANCET (2012)
Inclusion of Residual Tissue in Biobanks: Opt-In or Opt-Out?
Noor A. A. Giesbertz et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2012)
Study Newsletters, Community and Ethics Advisory Boards, and Focus Group Discussions Provide Ongoing Feedback for a Large Biobank
Catherine A. McCarty et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A (2011)
Sharing decisions in breast cancer care: Development of the Decision Analysis System for Oncology (DAS-O) to identify shared decision making during treatment consultations
Richard F. Brown et al.
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS (2011)
Biobanking residual tissues
Peter H. J. Riegman et al.
HUMAN GENETICS (2011)
Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences
Marie-Pierre Gagnon et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE (2011)
Consent for Biobanking: Assessing the Understanding and Views of Cancer Patients
Julien Mancini et al.
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2011)
Consumer participation and organizational development in health care: a systematic review
Clemens B. Tempfer et al.
WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT (2011)
Public Opinion about the Importance of Privacy in Biobank Research
David J. Kaufman et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2009)
Public Perspectives on Informed Consent for Biobanking
Juli Murphy et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2009)
Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand?
Matthew E. Falagas et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2009)
Research understanding, attitude and awareness towards biobanking: a survey among Italian twin participants to a genetic epidemiological study
Virgilia Toccaceli et al.
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS (2009)
A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samples
E. Vermeulen et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2009)
Opt-out plus, the patients' choice: preferences of cancer patients concerning information and consent regimen for future research with biological samples archived in the context of treatment
E. Vermeulen et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY (2009)
Globalized Clinical Trials and Informed Consent
George J. Annas
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2009)
Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study
David Kaufman et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2008)
Assessing genetic testing: Who are the lay experts?
Joanna Goven
HEALTH POLICY (2008)
Biobank research and the right to privacy
Lars Oystein Ursin
THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS (2008)
Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research
KA Kaphingst et al.
CLINICAL GENETICS (2006)
The therapeutic misconception and our models of competency and informed consent
Charles W. Lidz
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW (2006)
Informed consent: can a patient ever be fully informed?
M Lupton
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY (2005)
Public participation in regional health policy: a theoretical framework
WE Thurston et al.
HEALTH POLICY (2005)
Building on relationships of trust in biobank research
MG Hansson
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2005)
Public involvement in breast cancer research: An analysis and model for future research
S McCormick et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES (2004)
Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research - A systematic review
J Flory et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2004)
Share Paper
