Reliability and validity of the Nurse Practitioners' Roles and Competencies Scale

Aims and objectives. The objective of this study was to test the reliability and construct validity of the Nurse Practitioners' Roles and Competencies Scale. Background. The role of nurse practitioners has attracted international attention. The advanced nursing role played by nurse practitioners varies with national conditions and medical environments. To date, no suitable measurement tool has been available for assessing the roles and competencies of nurse practitioners in Asian countries. Design. Secondary analysis of data from three studies related to nurse practitioners' role competencies. Methods. We analysed data from 563 valid questionnaires completed in three studies to identify the factor structure of the Nurse Practitioners' Roles and Competencies Scale. To this end, we performed exploratory factor analysis using principal component analysis extraction with varimax orthogonal rotation. The internal consistency reliabilities of the overall scale and its subscales were examined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Results. The scale had six factors: professionalism, direct care, clinical research, practical guidance, medical assistance, as well as leadership and reform. These factors explained 67.5% of the total variance in nurse practitioners' role competencies. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the overall scale was 0.98, and those of its subscales ranged from 0.83-0.97. Conclusion. The internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Nurse Practitioners' Roles and Competencies Scale were good. The high internal consistency reliabilities suggest item redundancy, which should be minimised by using item response theory to enhance the applicability of this questionnaire for future academic and clinical studies.