4.5 Article

An A2A adenosine receptor agonist, ATL313, reduces inflammation and improves survival in murine sepsis models

Journal

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-141

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [1K08A165461-01A1, A113685-02, R44 A13685-02, R42 A146852-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The pathophysiology of sepsis is due in part to early systemic inflammation. Here we describe molecular and cellular responses, as well as survival, in A(2A) adenosine receptor (AR) agonist treated and untreated animals during experimental sepsis. Methods: Sepsis was induced in mice by intraperitoneal inoculation of live bacteria (Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Mice inoculated with live bacteria were treated with an A(2A) AR agonist (ATL313) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS), with or without the addition of a dose of ceftriaxone. LPS inoculated mice were treated with ATL313 or PBS. Serum cytokines and chemokines were measured sequentially at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after LPS was administered. In survival studies, mice were followed until death or for 7 days. Results: There was a significant survival benefit in mice infected with live E. coli (100% vs. 20%, p = 0.013) or S. aureus (60% vs. 20%, p = 0.02) when treated with ATL313 in conjunction with an antibiotic versus antibiotic alone. ATL313 also improved survival from endotoxic shock when compared to PBS treatment (90% vs. 40%, p = 0.005). The serum concentrations of TNF-alpha, MIP-1 alpha, MCP-1, IFN-gamma, and IL-17 were decreased by ATL313 after LPS injection (p < 0.05). Additionally, ATL313 increased the concentration of IL-10 under the same conditions (p < 0.05). Circulating white blood cell concentrations were higher in ATL313 treated animals (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Further studies are warranted to determine the clinical utility of ATL313 as a novel treatment for sepsis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available