4.5 Article

Basis for treatment of tuberculosis among HIV-infected patients in Tanzania: the role of chest x-ray and sputum culture

Journal

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-32

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FIC NIH HHS [D43-TW006807, D43 TW006807] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 45407, U01 AI045407, R01 AI045407] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Active tuberculosis (TB) is common among HIV-infected persons living in tuberculosis endemic countries, and screening for tuberculosis (TB) is recommended routinely. We sought to determine the role of chest x-ray and sputum culture in the decision to treat for presumptive TB using active case finding in a large cohort of HIV-infected patients. Methods: Ambulatory HIV-positive subjects with CD4 counts >= 200/mm(3) entering a Phase III TB vaccine study in Tanzania were screened for TB with a physical examination, standard interview, CD4 count, chest x-ray (CXR), blood culture for TB, and three sputum samples for acid fast bacillus (AFB) smear and culture. Results: Among 1176 subjects 136 (12%) were treated for presumptive TB. These patients were more frequently male than those without treatment (34% vs. 25%, respectively; p = 0.049) and had lower median CD4 counts (319/mu L vs. 425/mu L, respectively; p < .0001). Among the 136 patients treated for TB, 38 (28%) had microbiologic confirmation, including 13 (10%) who had a normal CXR and no symptoms. There were 58 (43%) treated patients in whom the only positive finding was an abnormal CXR. Blood cultures were negative in all patients. Conclusion: Many ambulatory HIV- infected patients with CD4 counts >= 200/mm(3) are treated for presumptive TB. Our data suggest that optimal detection requires comprehensive evaluation, including CXR and sputum culture on both symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available