3.8 Article

Don't Blame the Idealizations

Journal

JOURNAL FOR GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 85-100

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10838-013-9206-8

Keywords

Ceteris paribus; Idealization; Scientific representation; Scapegoat; Scope restrictor; Validity limit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Idealizing conditions are scapegoats for scientific hypotheses, too often blamed for falsehood better attributed to less obvious sources. But while the tendency to blame idealizations is common among both philosophers of science and scientists themselves, the blame is misplaced. Attention to the nature of idealizing conditions, the content of idealized hypotheses, and scientists' attitudes toward those hypotheses shows that idealizing conditions are blameless when hypotheses misrepresent. These conditions help to determine the content of idealized hypotheses, and they do so in a way that prevents those hypotheses from being false by virtue of their constituent idealizations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available