4.4 Review

A systematic review of different models of home and community care services for older persons

Journal

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-93

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dementia Collaborative Research Centre at University of New South Wales as part of the Australian Government's Initiative, Dementia
  2. NHMRC [455377]
  3. Prince of Wales Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Costs and consumer preference have led to a shift from the long-term institutional care of aged older people to home and community based care. The aim of this review is to evaluate the outcomes of case managed, integrated or consumer directed home and community care services for older persons, including those with dementia. Methods: A systematic review was conducted of non-medical home and community care services for frail older persons. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AgeLine, Scopus and PubMed were searched from 1994 to May 2009. Two researchers independently reviewed search results. Results: Thirty five papers were included in this review. Evidence from randomized controlled trials showed that case management improves function and appropriate use of medications, increases use of community services and reduces nursing home admission. Evidence, mostly from non-randomized trials, showed that integrated care increases service use; randomized trials reported that integrated care does not improve clinical outcomes. The lowest quality evidence was for consumer directed care which appears to increase satisfaction with care and community service use but has little effect on clinical outcomes. Studies were heterogeneous in methodology and results were not consistent. Conclusions: The outcomes of each model of care differ and correspond to the model's focus. Combining key elements of all three models may maximize outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available