4.7 Article

Anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in Brassica rapa

Journal

BMC GENOMICS
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-426

Keywords

Comparative genomics; Anthocyanin biosynthetic genes; Whole genome duplication; Brassica rapa; Cruciferae

Funding

  1. National High Technology R&D Program of China [2012AA100101]
  2. National Program on Key Basic Research Projects of China (The 973 Program) [2012CB113900, 2013CB127000, 2013CB127006]
  3. International Joint Research Grant of Ministry of Science and Technology, P. R. China [2011DFR31180]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31301771, 31201628]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Anthocyanins are a group of flavonoid compounds. As a group of important secondary metabolites, they perform several key biological functions in plants. Anthocyanins also play beneficial health roles as potentially protective factors against cancer and heart disease. To elucidate the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in Brassica rapa, we conducted comparative genomic analyses between Arabidopsis thaliana and B. rapa on a genome-wide level. Results: In total, we identified 73 genes in B. rapa as orthologs of 41 anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in A. thaliana. In B. rapa, the anthocyanin biosynthetic genes (ABGs) have expanded and most genes exist in more than one copy. The anthocyanin biosynthetic structural genes have expanded through whole genome and tandem duplication in B. rapa. More structural genes located upstream of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway have been retained than downstream. More negative regulatory genes are retained in the anthocyanin biosynthesis regulatory system of B. rapa. Conclusions: These results will promote an understanding of the genetic mechanism of anthocyanin biosynthesis, as well as help the improvement of the nutritional quality of B. rapa through the breeding of high anthocyanin content varieties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available