4.7 Article

Cellular Profiles of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid and Their Prognostic Significance for Non-HIV-Infected Patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages 1310-1316

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.03494-14

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Asan Institute of Life Sciences [2015-389]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The usefulness of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid cellular analysis in non-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) has not been adequately evaluated. The objective of this study was to analyze the cellular profiles of BAL fluid and to evaluate their prognostic significance in non-HIV-infected patients with PCP. A 7-year retrospective cohort study of 166 non-HIV-infected adult patients with PCP who underwent BAL was performed in a tertiary care hospital. The median total BAL fluid white blood cell count was 180/mu l (interquartile range, 80 to 330) and was unaffected by the severity of PCP. The median percentages of BAL fluid neutrophils, lymphocytes, and alveolar macrophages were 13.1%, 31.7%, and 30.2%, respectively. The median percentage of BAL fluid neutrophils was significantly higher in severe than in mild-to-moderate PCP (20.4% versus 6.0%, P<0.001), as was the absolute neutrophil count (24/mu l versus 13/mu l, P = 0.001). The percentage of BAL fluid neutrophils was an independent predictor of 30-day (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.03) and 60-day (aOR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.04) mortalities. The 30-day and 60-day mortalities increased at rates of 15% (P = 0.006) and 21% (P<0.001) per 10% increment of BAL fluid neutrophil levels, respectively. The degree of BAL fluid pleocytosis was relatively low without regard to the severity of PCP. The percentage of BAL fluid neutrophils can be used as a prognostic marker in non-HIV-infected patients with PCP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available