4.7 Article

De novo transcriptome characterization of Vitis vinifera cv. Corvina unveils varietal diversity

Journal

BMC GENOMICS
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-41

Keywords

Transcriptomics; RNA-Seq; de novo assembly; Grape; Varietal diversity

Funding

  1. Fondazione Cariverona (Completamento e attivita del Centro di Genomica Funzionale Vegetale), Verona, Italy
  2. Valorizzazione dei Principali Vitigni Autoctoni Italiani e dei loro Terroir (Vigneto)
  3. Italian Ministry of Agricultural and Forestry Policies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Plants such as grapevine (Vitis spp.) display significant inter-cultivar genetic and phenotypic variation. The genetic components underlying phenotypic diversity in grapevine must be understood in order to disentangle genetic and environmental factors. Results: We have shown that cDNA sequencing by RNA-seq is a robust approach for the characterization of varietal diversity between a local grapevine cultivar (Corvina) and the PN40024 reference genome. We detected 15,161 known genes including 9463 with novel splice isoforms, and identified 2321 potentially novel protein-coding genes in non-annotated or unassembled regions of the reference genome. We also discovered 180 apparent private genes in the Corvina genome which were missing from the reference genome. Conclusions: The de novo assembly approach allowed a substantial amount of the Corvina transcriptome to be reconstructed, improving known gene annotations by robustly defining gene structures, annotating splice isoforms and detecting genes without annotations. The private genes we discovered are likely to be nonessential but could influence certain cultivar-specific characteristics. Therefore, the application of de novo transcriptome assembly should not be restricted to species lacking a reference genome because it can also improve existing reference genome annotations and identify novel, cultivar-specific genes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available