Journal
BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages 1817-1831Publisher
COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-11-1817-2014
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- National Science Foundation
- US Department of Homeland Security
- US Department of Agriculture through NSF [EF-0832858]
- University of Tennessee, Knoxville
- EPSRC [EP/I004165/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I004165/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- Directorate For Geosciences [1020767] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A number of nonlinear models have recently been proposed for simulating soil carbon decomposition. Their predictions of soil carbon responses to fresh litter input and warming differ significantly from conventional linear models. Using both stability analysis and numerical simulations, we showed that two of those nonlinear models (a two-pool model and a three-pool model) exhibit damped oscillatory responses to small perturbations. Stability analysis showed the frequency of oscillation is proportional to root(epsilon(-1) - 1) K-s/V-s in the two-pool model, and to root(epsilon(-1) - 1) K-l/V-l in the three-pool model, where epsilon is microbial growth efficiency, K-s and K-l are the half saturation constants of soil and litter carbon, respectively, and V-s and V-l are the maximal rates of carbon decomposition per unit of microbial biomass for soil and litter carbon, respectively. For both models, the oscillation has a period of between 5 and 15 years depending on other parameter values, and has smaller amplitude at soil temperatures between 0 and 15 degrees C. In addition, the equilibrium pool sizes of litter or soil carbon are insensitive to carbon inputs in the nonlinear model, but are proportional to carbon input in the conventional linear model. Under warming, the microbial biomass and litter carbon pools simulated by the nonlinear models can increase or decrease, depending whether epsilon varies with temperature. In contrast, the conventional linear models always simulate a decrease in both microbial and litter carbon pools with warming. Based on the evidence available, we concluded that the oscillatory behavior and insensitivity of soil carbon to carbon input are notable features in these nonlinear models that are somewhat unrealistic. We recommend that a better model for capturing the soil carbon dynamics over decadal to centennial timescales would combine the sensitivity of the conventional models to carbon influx with the flexible response to warming of the nonlinear model.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available