4.7 Article

Biophsyical constraints on gross primary production by the terrestrial biosphere

Journal

BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 11, Issue 20, Pages 5987-6001

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-11-5987-2014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP120103600]
  2. Imperial College
  3. AmeriFlux (US Department of Energy, Biological and Environmental Research, Terrestrial Carbon Program) [DE-FG02-04ER63917, DE-FG02-04ER63911]
  4. CFCAS
  5. NSERC
  6. BIOCAP
  7. Environment Canada
  8. NRCan
  9. CarboEuropeIP
  10. FAO-GTOS-TCO
  11. iLEAPS
  12. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  13. National Science Foundation
  14. University of Tuscia
  15. Universite Laval and Environment Canada
  16. US Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Persistent divergences among the predictions of complex carbon-cycle models include differences in the sign as well as the magnitude of the response of global terrestrial primary production to climate change. Such problems with current models indicate an urgent need to reassess the principles underlying the environmental controls of primary production. The global patterns of annual and maximum monthly terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) by C-3 plants are explored here using a simple first-principles model based on the light-use efficiency formalism and the Farquhar model for C-3 photosynthesis. The model is driven by incident photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and remotely sensed green-vegetation cover, with additional constraints imposed by low-temperature inhibition and CO2 limitation. The ratio of leaf-internal to ambient CO2 concentration in the model responds to growing-season mean temperature, atmospheric dryness (indexed by the cumulative water deficit, Delta E) and elevation, based on an optimality theory. The greatest annual GPP is predicted for tropical moist forests, but the maximum (summer) monthly GPP can be as high, or higher, in boreal or temperate forests. These findings are supported by a new analysis of CO2 flux measurements. The explanation is simply based on the seasonal and latitudinal distribution of PAR combined with the physiology of photosynthesis. By successively imposing biophysical constraints, it is shown that partial vegetation cover - driven primarily by water shortage - represents the largest constraint on global GPP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available