4.7 Article

Meta-analysis and genome-wide interpretation of genetic susceptibility to drug addiction

Journal

BMC GENOMICS
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-508

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB518000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171269]
  3. NIH IRP (NIDA)
  4. China National High-tech 863 Programs [2007AA02Z165]
  5. 973 Programs [2007CB946904]
  6. Merck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Classical genetic studies provide strong evidence for heritable contributions to susceptibility to developing dependence on addictive substances. Candidate gene and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have sought genes, chromosomal regions and allelic variants likely to contribute to susceptibility to drug addiction. Results: Here, we performed a meta-analysis of addiction candidate gene association studies and GWAS to investigate possible functional mechanisms associated with addiction susceptibility. From meta-data retrieved from 212 publications on candidate gene association studies and 5 GWAS reports, we linked a total of 843 haplotypes to addiction susceptibility. We mapped the SNPs in these haplotypes to functional and regulatory elements in the genome and estimated the magnitude of the contributions of different molecular mechanisms to their effects on addiction susceptibility. In addition to SNPs in coding regions, these data suggest that haplotypes in gene regulatory regions may also contribute to addiction susceptibility. When we compared the lists of genes identified by association studies and those identified by molecular biological studies of drug-regulated genes, we observed significantly higher participation in the same gene interaction networks than expected by chance, despite little overlap between the two gene lists. Conclusions: These results appear to offer new insights into the genetic factors underlying drug addiction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available