4.6 Article

Application of GA-SVM method with parameter optimization for landslide development prediction

Journal

NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 525-533

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-14-525-2014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2013CB733205]
  2. Key Deployment Research Program of CAS [KZZD-EW-05-01-02]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40802072]
  4. Key Research Program of Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Surface Process, CAS [Y3K2040040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prediction of the landslide development process is always a hot issue in landslide research. So far, many methods for landslide displacement series prediction have been proposed. The support vector machine (SVM) has been proved to be a novel algorithm with good performance. However, the performance strongly depends on the right selection of the parameters (C and gamma) of the SVM model. In this study, we present an application of genetic algorithm and support vector machine (GA-SVM) method with parameter optimization in landslide displacement rate prediction. We selected a typical large-scale landslide in a hydro-electrical engineering area of southwest China as a case. On the basis of analyzing the basic characteristics and monitoring data of the landslide, a single-factor GA-SVM model and a multifactor GA-SVM model of the landslide were built. Moreover, the models were compared with single-factor and multifactor SVM models of the landslide. The results show that the four models have high prediction accuracies, but the accuracies of GA-SVM models are slightly higher than those of SVM models, and the accuracies of multi-factor models are slightly higher than those of single-factor models for the landslide prediction. The accuracy of the multi-factor GA-SVM models is the highest, with the smallest root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0009 and the highest relation index (RI) of 0.9992.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available