4.2 Article

Is the auditory evoked P2 response a biomarker of learning?

Journal

FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00028

Keywords

auditory; training; Elle P2; exposure; learning; rehabilitation; electrophysiology

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-DC007705, R01-DC012769, P30-DC04661, F30-DC010297]
  2. Fonds National de Recherche Scientifique (FRS-FNRS), Brussels, Belgium
  3. American Academy of Audiology
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [T32DC005361] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Even though auditory training exercises for humans have been shown to improve certain perceptual skills of individuals with and without hearing loss, there is a lack of knowledge pertaining to which aspects of training are responsible for the perceptual gains, and which aspects of perception are changed. To better define how auditory training impacts brain and behavior, electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) have been used to determine the time course and coincidence of cortical modulations associated with different types of training. Here we focus on P1-N1-P2 auditory evoked responses (AEP), as there are consistent reports of gains in P2 amplitude following various types of auditory training experiences; including music and speech-sound training. The purpose of this experiment was to determine if the auditory evoked P2 response is a biomarker of learning. To do this, we taught native English speakers to identify a new pre-voiced temporal cue that is not used phonemically in the English language so that coinciding changes in evoked neural activity could be characterized. To differentiate possible effects of repeated stimulus exposure and a button-pushing task from learning itself, we examined modulations in brain activity in a group of participants who learned to identify the pre-voicing contrast and compared it to participants, matched in time, and stimulus exposure, that did not. The main finding was that the amplitude of the P2 auditory evoked response increased across repeated EEG sessions for all groups, regardless of any change in perceptual performance. What's more, these effects are retained for months. Changes in P2 amplitude were attributed to changes in neural activity associated with the acquisition process and not the learned outcome itself. A further finding was the expression of a late negativity (LN) wave 600-900 ms post stimulus onset, post-training exclusively for the group that learned to identify the pre voiced contrast.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available