4.7 Article

Complementary RNA amplification methods enhance microarray identification of transcripts expressed in the C. elegans nervous system

Journal

BMC GENOMICS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-84

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA68485, P30 CA068485] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NEI NIH HHS [P30 EY008126, P30 EY08126] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHGRI NIH HHS [U01 HG004263, HG004263] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL6744] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NICHD NIH HHS [HD15052, P30 HD015052] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIDDK NIH HHS [P01 DK058212, P01 DK58212, P60 DK20593, P60 DK020593, P30 DK058404, P30 DK58404] Funding Source: Medline
  7. NIMH NIH HHS [T32 MH64913, T32 MH064913] Funding Source: Medline
  8. NINDS NIH HHS [F31 NS049743, R01 NS026115, R01 NS26115] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: DNA microarrays provide a powerful method for global analysis of gene expression. The application of this technology to specific cell types and tissues, however, is typically limited by small amounts of available mRNA, thereby necessitating amplification. Here we compare microarray results obtained with two different methods of RNA amplification to profile gene expression in the C. elegans larval nervous system. Results: We used the mRNA-tagging strategy to isolate transcripts specifically from C. elegans larval neurons. The WT-Ovation Pico System (WT-Pico) was used to amplify 2 ng of pan-neural RNA to produce labeled cDNA for microarray analysis. These WT-Pico-derived data were compared to microarray results obtained with a labeled aRNA target generated by two rounds of In Vitro Transcription (IVT) of 25 ng of pan-neural RNA. WT-Pico results in a higher fraction of present calls than IVT, a finding consistent with the proposal that DNA-DNA hybridization results in lower mismatch signals than the RNA-DNA heteroduplexes produced by IVT amplification. Microarray data sets from these samples were compared to a reference profile of all larval cells to identify transcripts with elevated expression in neurons. These results were validated by the high proportion of known neuron-expressed genes detected in these profiles and by promoter-GFP constructs for previously uncharacterized genes in these data sets. Together, the IVT and WT-Pico methods identified 2,173 unique neuron-enriched transcripts. Only about half of these transcripts (1,044), however, are detected as enriched by both IVT and WT-Pico amplification. Conclusion: We show that two different methods of RNA amplification, IVT and WT-Pico, produce valid microarray profiles of gene expression in the C. elegans larval nervous system with a low rate of false positives. However, our results also show that each method of RNA amplification detects a unique subset of bona fide neural-enriched transcripts and thus a wider array of authentic neural genes are identified by the combination of these data sets than by the microarray profiles obtained with either method of RNA amplification alone. With its relative ease of implementation and greater sensitivity, WT-Pico is the preferred method of amplification for cases in which sample RNA is limiting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available