4.4 Article

Performance of HLA allele prediction methods in African Americans for class II genes HLA-DRB1,-DQB1, and-DPB1

Journal

BMC GENETICS
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-72

Keywords

HLA; African American; Single nucleotide polymorphisms; Imputation; Admixture

Funding

  1. [R56-AI072727]
  2. [R01-HL092576]
  3. [R01-HL54306]
  4. [U01-HL060263]
  5. [1RC2HL101499]
  6. [R01HL113326]
  7. [P20GM103456]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The expense of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allele genotyping has motivated the development of imputation methods that use dense single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype data and the region's haplotype structure, but the performance of these methods in admixed populations (such as African Americans) has not been adequately evaluated. We compared genotype-based-derived from both genome-wide genotyping and targeted sequencing-imputation results to existing allele data for HLA-DRB1, -DQB1, and -DPB1. Results: In European Americans, the newly-developed HLA Genotype Imputation with Attribute Bagging (HIBAG) method outperformed HLA*IMP:02. In African Americans, HLA*IMP:02 performed marginally better than HIBAG pre-built models, but HIBAG models constructed using a portion of our African American sample with both SNP genotyping and four-digit HLA class II allele typing had consistently higher accuracy than HLA*IMP:02. However, HIBAG was significantly less accurate in individuals heterozygous for local ancestry (p <= 0.04). Accuracy improved in models with equal numbers of African and European chromosomes. Variants added by targeted sequencing and SNP imputation further improved both imputation accuracy and the proportion of high quality calls. Conclusion: Combining the HIBAG approach with local ancestry and dense variant data can produce highly-accurate HLA class II allele imputation in African Americans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available