Journal
BMC GENETICS
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-6
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [30871392]
- Medical Research Council [MC_U106179471] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Genetic association study is currently the primary vehicle for identification and characterization of disease-predisposing variant(s) which usually involves multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) available. However, SNP-wise association tests raise concerns over multiple testing. Haplotype-based methods have the advantage of being able to account for correlations between neighbouring SNPs, yet assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and potentially large number degrees of freedom can harm its statistical power and robustness. Approaches based on principal component analysis (PCA) are preferable in this regard but their performance varies with methods of extracting principal components (PCs). Results: PCA-based bootstrap confidence interval test (PCA BCIT), which directly uses the PC scores to assess gene-disease association, was developed and evaluated for three ways of extracting PCs, i.e., cases only(CAES), controls only(COES) and cases and controls combined(CES). Extraction of PCs with COES is preferred to that with CAES and CES. Performance of the test was examined via simulations as well as analyses on data of rheumatoid arthritis and heroin addiction, which maintains nominal level under null hypothesis and showed comparable performance with permutation test. Conclusions: PCA-BCIT is a valid and powerful method for assessing gene-disease association involving multiple SNPs.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available