4.4 Article

Intergenic DNA sequences from the human X chromosome reveal high rates of global gene flow

Journal

BMC GENETICS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-9-76

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [BCS-0423670]
  2. San Diego Supercomputing Center [DBS060002T]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Despite intensive efforts devoted to collecting human polymorphism data, little is known about the role of gene flow in the ancestry of human populations. This is partly because most analyses have applied one of two simple models of population structure, the island model or the splitting model, which make unrealistic biological assumptions. Results: Here, we analyze98-kb of DNA sequence from 20 independently evolving intergenic regions on the X chromosome in a sample of 90 humans from six globally diverse populations. We employ an isolation-with-migration (IM) model, which assumes that populations split and subsequently exchange migrants, to independently estimate effective population sizes and migration rates. While the maximum effective size of modern humans is estimated at similar to 10,000, individual populations vary substantially in size, with African populations tending to be larger (2,300-9,000) than non-African populations (300-3,300). We estimate mean rates of bidirectional gene flow at 4.8 x 10(-4)/generation. Bidirectional migration rates are similar to 5-fold higher among non-African populations (1.5 x 10(-3)) than among African populations (2.7 x 10(-4)). Interestingly, because effective sizes and migration rates are inversely related in African and non-African populations, population migration rates are similar within Africa and Eurasia (e. g., global mean Nm = 2.4). Conclusion: We conclude that gene flow has played an important role in structuring global human populations and that migration rates should be incorporated as critical parameters in models of human demography.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available