4.8 Article

Vanadium Sulfide on Reduced Graphene Oxide Layer as a Promising Anode for Sodium Ion Battery

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 7, Issue 37, Pages 20902-20908

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b06385

Keywords

sodium ion battery; VS4; reduced graphene oxide; anode; energy storage

Funding

  1. National Natural Basic Research Program of China [2013CB934103, 2012CB933003]
  2. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China [2013DFA50840]
  3. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51425204]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51272197]
  5. Hubei Province Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [2014CFA035]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013-ZD-7, 2014-YB-001]
  7. Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (WUT) [20141049701006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As an alternative system of rechargeable lithium ion batteries, sodium ion batteries revitalize researchers' interest due to the low cost, abundant sodium resources, and similar storage mechanism to lithium ion batteries. VS4 has emerged as a promising anode material for SIBs due to low cost and its unique linear chains structure that can offer a potential sites for sodium storage. Herein, we present the growth of VS4 on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) as STBs anode for the first time. The VS4/rGO anode exhibits promising performance in SIBs. It delivers a reversible capacity of 362 mAh g(-1) at 100 mA g(-1) and a good rate performance. We also investigate the sodium storage behavior of the VS4/rGO. Different than most transition metal sulfides, the VS4/rGO composite experiences a three-step separation mechanism during the sodiation process (VS4 to metallic V and Na2S, then the electrochemical mechanism is akin to Na-S). The VS4/rGO composite proves to be a promising material for rechargeable SIBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available