4.4 Article

Efficacy and safety of alirocumab vs ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients, with a statin rechallenge arm: The ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE randomized trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIPIDOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 758-769

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.08.006

Keywords

Lipid-lowering drugs; Clinical trials; PCSK9; Lipoproteins; Monoclonal antibodies

Funding

  1. Sanofi
  2. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  3. Amgen
  4. Kowa
  5. Lilly
  6. Novartis
  7. Regeneron
  8. Genzyme
  9. Pfizer
  10. Catabasis
  11. Esperion
  12. B. Braun
  13. Kaneka
  14. National Institutes of Health
  15. Genomas Pharmaceuticals
  16. Roche
  17. Accumetrics
  18. Arisaph
  19. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  20. Regeneron/Sanofi
  21. Genzyme/Sanofi
  22. GlaxoSmithKline
  23. Amarin Pharma
  24. AstraZeneca
  25. Boehringer Ingelheim
  26. Eli Lilly
  27. Genkyotex
  28. Novo-Nordisk
  29. Danone
  30. Aegerion
  31. American Society for Preventive Cardiology
  32. Mayo Clinic Support Services Texas Non Profit Health Organization
  33. Familial Hypercholesterolemia Foundation
  34. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc
  35. Novella
  36. Novella, and Merck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Statin intolerance limits many patients from achieving optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations. Current options for such patients include using a lower but tolerated dose of a statin and adding or switching to ezetimibe or other non-statin therapies. METHODS: ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE (NCT01709513) compared alirocumab with ezetimibe in patients at moderate to high cardiovascular risk with statin intolerance (unable to tolerate >= 2 statins, including one at the lowest approved starting dose) due to muscle symptoms. A placebo run-in and statin rechallenge arm were included in an attempt to confirm intolerance. Patients (n = 361) received single-blind subcutaneous (SC) and oral placebo for 4 weeks during placebo run-in. Patients reporting muscle-related symptoms during the run-in were to be withdrawn. Continuing patients were randomized (2:2:1) to double-blind alirocumab 75 mg SC every 2 weeks (Q2W; plus oral placebo), ezetimibe 10 mg/d (plus SC placebo Q2W), or atorvastatin 20 mg/d (rechallenge; plus SC placebo Q2W) for 24 weeks. Alirocumab dose was increased to 150 mg Q2W at week 12 depending on week 8 LDL-C values. Primary end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 (intent-to-treat) for alirocumab vs ezetimibe. RESULTS: Baseline mean (standard deviation) LDL-C was 191.3 (69.3) mg/dL (5.0 [1.8] mmol/L). Alirocumab reduced mean (standard error) LDL-C by 45.0% (2.2%) vs 14.6% (2.2%) with ezetimibe (mean difference 30.4% [3.1%], P < .0001). Skeletal muscle-related events were less frequent with alirocumab vs atorvastatin (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.99, P = .042). CONCLUSIONS: Alirocumab produced greater LDL-C reductions than ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients, with fewer skeletal-muscle adverse events vs atorvastatin. (C) 2015 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available