4.2 Article

The Development and Initial Validation of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire

Journal

BEHAVIOR THERAPY
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 83-101

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001

Keywords

cognitive-behavior therapy; acceptance and commitment therapy; measurement; questionnaires; cognitive fusion

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G000700/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. ESRC [ES/G000700/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) emphasizes the relationship a person has with their thoughts and beliefs as potentially more relevant than belief content in predicting the emotional and behavioral consequences of cognition. In ACT, defusion interventions aim to unhook thoughts from actions and to create psychological distance between a person and their thoughts, beliefs, memories, and self-stories. A number of similar concepts have been described in the psychology literature (e.g., decentering, metacognition, mentalization, and mindfulness) suggesting converging evidence that how we relate to mental events may be of critical importance. While there are some good measures of these related processes, none of them provides an adequate operationalization of cognitive fusion. Despite the centrality of cognitive fusion in the ACT model, there is as yet no agreed-upon measure of cognitive fusion. This paper presents the construction and development of a brief, self-report measure of cognitive fusion: The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ). The results of a series of studies involving over 1,800 people across diverse samples show good preliminary evidence of the CFQ's factor structure, reliability, temporal stability, validity, discriminant validity, and sensitivity to treatment effects. The potential uses of the CFQ in research and clinical practice are outlined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available